Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSA Airlines Flight 5320

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

PSA Airlines Flight 5320

PSA Airlines Flight 5320 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable incident, its been nearly 2 years since the incident and the references are all dated within a week of the incident WP:PERSISTENCE, no injuries, no major effects on aviation. Covered Locally WP:GEOSCOPE. And sadly based on one of the misplaced reference #4(for another flight in 2010),planes hitting deers seems routine. Daiyusha (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Might have been better as a point under American Eagle (airline_brand)#Accidents and incidents. I wasn't quite sure about notability to be honest, though on the point about local scope, it did receive some national coverage through AP syndication and The Atlantic.DontCallMeLateForDinner 28 December 2018 —Preceding undated comment added 06:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. "More than 1,000 deer have been hit by airplanes across the country in the past two decades, according to FAA data." Until Bambi is the victim, none of them is anything special. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - as per WP:NOTNEWS -- no lasting coverage.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

• Delete no sign of being noteworthy for a mention in wikipedia never mind a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Deer are not oteworthy last time I checked. Otherwise we would need an article every time one slipped it's mortal coil!!--Petebutt (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Plane hits deer - a spurt of coverage in Feb 2017, and nothing WP:LASTING since. Icewhiz (talk) 13:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - Why is this newsworthy or even "articleworthy" ? ... No lasting damage (other than the poor little deer dying). Fails GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Christmas / Happy New Year} 16:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.